Is it a common belief that non-violent bullying might prevent more severe forms of violence in schools, or is there another reason why it seems to be tolerated?
How does it reduce actual violence? If anything, it builds and festers until violence happens. The real issue involves the politics of reporting school infractions. In Florida, for instance, schools are pushed to show fewer infractions each year as a sign of ‘improvement,’ but it really just hides the underlying problems. There’s also the issue of parents who refuse to believe their child could be problematic.
@LyamGenesis
I’ve witnessed a level of bullying in Florida that I never saw while teaching in Maine or Russia.
Schools shouldn’t tolerate any form of bullying, but it’s difficult to address bullies about consequences. For example, look at high-profile figures who exhibit bullying behavior without facing any consequences. This sets a poor example.
@bernarddeacon
Such figures should face serious legal consequences for their actions, considering the severity of incidents like those on January 6th.
Wyatt said:
@bernarddeacon
Such figures should face serious legal consequences for their actions, considering the severity of incidents like those on January 6th.
Executed, though? Isn’t that a bit extreme?
@dominic
Absolutely. The actions taken were against the people, and it’s a serious breach of our country’s moral and legal standards.
Sometimes it feels like administrators have their hands tied due to political pressures, which makes it harder to take action against bullying.
Sophia said:
Sometimes it feels like administrators have their hands tied due to political pressures, which makes it harder to take action against bullying.
Administrators often feel trapped by political pressure. Politicians easily criticize schools as failing, which can lead to resistance against expelling problematic students due to potential legal and public backlash.
Sophia said:
Sometimes it feels like administrators have their hands tied due to political pressures, which makes it harder to take action against bullying.
We need to prioritize children and replace ineffective administrators with dedicated, high-quality educators.
@lucas
Sadly, even well-intentioned individuals can become part of the problem due to systemic issues.
Sophia said:
@lucas
Sadly, even well-intentioned individuals can become part of the problem due to systemic issues.
Then it’s clear we need a complete system overhaul to truly put kids first.
@lucas
Replacing staff sounds simple, but who will fill those roles? Teaching positions are hard to fill due to low pay and challenging working conditions.
Bright said:
@lucas
Replacing staff sounds simple, but who will fill those roles? Teaching positions are hard to fill due to low pay and challenging working conditions.
First, reform funding structures. Then, improve teacher salaries and school discipline. Too much money is currently wasted on unnecessary administrative costs.
@lucas
While funding reform is necessary, politicians often divert these funds elsewhere instead of improving educational environments. As a school board member, I see the need for careful planning rather than drastic cuts.
@lucas
Simplistic solutions might lead to situations reminiscent of poorly managed government departments.
Prof.Matthew said:
@lucas
Simplistic solutions might lead to situations reminiscent of poorly managed government departments.
Exactly, we need practical and sustainable plans, not just hopeful strategies.
Non-violent bullying is often less visible but just as damaging. It’s not more tolerated; it’s simply harder to detect and manage.
Brianna said:
Non-violent bullying is often less visible but just as damaging. It’s not more tolerated; it’s simply harder to detect and manage.
As a teacher, I strive to notice and address all forms of bullying, but it requires being able to detect subtle signs since children can be very sneaky.
What evidence supports the idea that ignoring non-violent bullying reduces more serious violence?