To determine if a student’s work is original, we could emphasize classroom discussions more. This approach would allow students to articulate and defend their ideas in detail. However, it might not be entirely fair to those who struggle with public speaking, and it doesn’t fully address the issue.
I support this idea. It’s feasible if school administrators agree and accommodations are made to encourage student participation. Also, using handwritten work can significantly reduce AI use and cheating.
@AmeliaScarlet
Handwritten tests are a good solution. Let students use AI for learning, but insist on paper for tests to ensure authenticity.
PoshDontleton said:
@AmeliaScarlet
Handwritten tests are a good solution. Let students use AI for learning, but insist on paper for tests to ensure authenticity.
There are many tools to prevent cheating on digital devices. By having students complete assignments in class rather than at home, we can better control the learning environment, though it may slow down course progress in some subjects.
@Travis
My school doesn’t provide devices; students bring their own, which vary widely. In my physics classes, tests require practical application of concepts on paper. For example, calculating distances in a ski jump problem using physics principles needs practice that can’t be mimicked by typing answers.
@Linah
It’s surprising that some schools still don’t use managed devices. Our network requires security measures that all connected devices must comply with.
Travis said:
@Linah
It’s surprising that some schools still don’t use managed devices. Our network requires security measures that all connected devices must comply with.
We’re a private Catholic school and don’t receive government funding, so many public school regulations don’t apply to us. Students buy their own devices, and while our network is filtered, it’s not foolproof.
@Travis
Lock-down browsers aren’t foolproof. Students often find ways around them, even with the best software.
BookwormBard said:
@Travis
Lock-down browsers aren’t foolproof. Students often find ways around them, even with the best software.
True, the effectiveness of these tools depends on how they’re used by teachers and the quality of the software. Well-managed tech can make secure testing feasible.
PoshDontleton said:
@AmeliaScarlet
Handwritten tests are a good solution. Let students use AI for learning, but insist on paper for tests to ensure authenticity.
I completely agree.
Public speaking is a crucial skill that is often overlooked in education. Encouraging this can help students learn to express their ideas and handle criticism constructively, which is valuable regardless of the context.
It’s not about unfairness; education is about teaching new skills, not just leveraging existing talents. Learning public speaking is essential for practical reasons and self-confidence.
Assessing students fairly based on classroom participation is challenging, especially with large groups.
I’m introducing a cumulative essay project next year. Students will develop an essay over time, which helps them learn to refine and evaluate their work, even if the initial draft is AI-generated.
While discussions are valuable, using them as a main assessment tool could be impractical given the constraints of modern classroom sizes and curricula.
Lily said:
While discussions are valuable, using them as a main assessment tool could be impractical given the constraints of modern classroom sizes and curricula.
This method might be more feasible in history or English classes.
Discussions help assess comprehension but not writing skills. We still need to teach and evaluate students’ writing abilities.
For less confident speakers, using specific discussion rubrics can help assess the quality of contributions rather than the quantity, promoting a balanced approach.
Relying on presentations and discussions can detract from learning due to group dynamics. Traditional, tech-free methods might be more effective for accurate assessment.
Simpler might be better: regular tests and on-demand essays, done individually and without digital aids, would more directly measure student knowledge and skills.